A Brief Insight into Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs)
In recent months, Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) have gained significant attention, with digital assets selling for substantial amounts, including recent sales by Nigerian digital artists for 9 ETH and 13.2 ETH. This emerging trend raises questions about the nature of NFTs, how they differ from cryptocurrencies, and their legal implications. In this article, we will explore what NFTs are, their distinct features, and their growing relevance in intellectual property protection.
What are NFTs?
When something is said to be “non-fungible” it means that thing is unique and cannot be replaced with something else. For example, a naira note is fungible in that you can barely identify the difference between two naira notes, and you’ll have the same thing. NFTs can really be anything digital that represents a wide range of tangible and intangible items (such as drawings, music, virtual sports cards, real estate, etc.). Unlike regular cryptocurrencies, NFTs cannot be directly exchanged with one another. This is because there are no NFTs that are identical – each non-fungible token has its specific information and it is impossible to exchange it with another.
Difference Between NFTs and Cryptocurrencies
The key difference between NFTs and cryptocurrencies is that currencies allow fungible trade, which means that bitcoins can be exchanged for another and they are identical. While NFTs are designed to uniquely restrict and represent a unique claim on an asset. NFTs are coded with smart contracts that govern the verification of ownership and manage the transferability of the NFTs.
NFTs and Intellectual Property
The wave of Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) raises legal questions that concern digital ownership, intellectual property, royalty collection and regulatory issues in the digital ecosystem. NFTs are protected by smart contracts and through a minting process that assigns a unique identity to the digital asset and creates a contract that cannot be changed by anyone. This process protects the intellectual property of the owner and prevents the ownership to be claimed by someone else unless granted to another party.
Conclusion
NFTs are becoming so popular, but it’s unclear how they fit into the existing legal and regulatory frameworks that govern the financial, technology and cryptocurrency industries in Africa and Nigeria because cryptocurrency transactions in Nigeria have been stifled by regulations. We look forward to the financial regulators creating a framework to govern the use of NFTs in the digital space.
Related publications
Protecting Your Business Edge: Enforcing Confidentiality and Non-Compete Clauses in Nigerian Employment Contracts
Confidentiality and non-compete clauses in employment contracts remain essential tools for safeguarding a company’s competitive advantage during such transitions. However, enforcing these provisions in Nigeria requires careful attention to common law principles and the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Act (FCCPA) 2018.
CBN Issues Baseline Standards for Automated AML Solutions: A New Compliance Paradigm for Financial Institutions
On March 10, 2026, the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) introduced a significant regulatory development with the issuance of its Baseline Standards for Automated Anti-Money Laundering (AML) Solutions. This framework represents a decisive shift in how financial institutions are expected to detect, prevent, and report financial crimes, particularly in an increasingly digitised financial ecosystem.
The SEC’s Revised Capital Requirement and What It Means for Nigeria’s Market Operators
Nigeria’s capital market is entering a more stringent regulatory phase following the SEC’s issuance of Circular No. 26-1 on January 16, 2026. The circular introduces sweeping increases in minimum capital requirements across virtually all operator categories, signalling a clear shift from broad market participation to financial resilience and institutional stability. Rather than a routine update, the framework represents a structural reset that compels operators to reassess their capital strength, operational scale, and long-term viability.
